MICHAEL CHURCH
BACK TO BASICS FEBRUARY, 1997 CLIMB & CRUISE As promised last month, this article will concentrate on making a variable pitch prop continue to work efficiently through climb and cruise, picking things up after the first power reduction to cruise climb. According to the book, 24" and 2400 RPM will give you 133 kts and a fuel burn of 9.9 gph. Reducing power to 23" and 2300 RPM will produce 127 kts at 9 gph, a 5% reduction in speed with a better than 10% reduction in fuel burn. Leaving the MP at 23" and further reducing the RPM to 2200 looks even better: 125 kts at 8.7 gph, less than 2% more speed reduction with an additional 3% increase in fuel economy. Although the lower airspeeds produced by each of the two reduced power settings do result in lower airframe drag, the majority of the increase in fuel efficiency comes from using bigger and bigger prop blade angles (evidenced by the lower RPM)--angles that take full advantage of prop airfoil design, working the blades close to an ideal lift-to-drag ratio. The primary benefit? Lower costs at the gas pump. As a secondary advantage to lower RPM selections, you might consider the very substantial reduction in cabin noise--well worth the trade-off of a few minutes of extended flight time in terms of pilot and passenger fatigue. In cruise, at the other end of the performance range, emphasis naturally shifts away from maximum power. Now, constant speed props prove superior by permitting the pilot to compensate for the changes in prop angle of attack that accompany aircraft acceleration. By making extremely high blade angles available, the mechanism guarantees improved prop aerodynamics. Next month, Ill consider descents, landings, go-arounds, and emergencies. |